The aid delusion

The new year has started where the old left off, with a media spotlight on the shortcomings of overseas aid. As 2013 is set to be the year when the UK finally reaches the hallowed 0.7% target (see Graham’s posting below), DFID is rightly coming under pressure from left and right to explain why handing over billions of pounds to multinationals, multilaterals and consultants is a good use of taxpayers’ money. This week’s Spectator weighs in with a front cover devoted to ‘the aid delusion’; while the articles in the magazine itselfThe Aid Delusion are pretty vacuous, the international development sector needs to accept that the issue is a real one that goes well beyond ‘improving the effectiveness of aid’.

If we are serious about the struggle for global justice, we need to acknowledge that aid does not bring development in any meaningful sense. Aid may ‘save lives’ (the standard formulation which aid agencies fall back on most regularly) and relieve suffering, but it does not address the structural factors that condemn generation after generation to poverty, which is surely what we as a sector are supposed to do. As Sunday’s Radio 4 piece Inside the Aid Industry noted, the Nairobi slum of Kibera has had 800 aid agencies working within its two square miles for years, and yet still has no running water or electricity. Charles Abugre, now heading up the UN Millennium Campaign in Africa, spoke of the need for political challenge to bring lasting change, and called on NGOs to make that their priority. “Ultimately,” as he concluded, “you can’t eradicate poverty through aid.”


About John Hilary

Executive Director at War on Want
This entry was posted in Media. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The aid delusion

  1. owentudor says:

    I don’t think aid can be confined solely to saving lives: it also provides much needed budgetary support for schools, hospitals, infrastructure investment etc – basically, it can cover anything state expenditure does. Clearly we would like more sustainable sources for that, eg cracking down on tax evasion etc, but we shouldn’t throw the public expenditure baby out with the humanitarian relief bathwater!

  2. Pingback: Was Greening’s first year a success? « Political Blok

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s